Medical Marijuana Advocates File Lawsuit Challenging L.A. Dispensary Ordinance
Restrictive provisions amount to de facto ban on otherwise legal dispensariesLos Angeles, CA -- The country's largest medical marijuana
advocacy organization, Americans for Safe Access (ASA), filed a lawsuit
against the City of Los Angeles today, claiming that certain provisions
in a recently adopted regulatory ordinance would shut down virtually
all dispensaries in the city. The local medical marijuana law passed by
the City Council and signed by Mayor Villaraigosa on February 3rd
requires dispensaries to find a new location within 7 days after
the ordinance takes effect. In order to comply with the
ordinance, dispensaries must be located at least 1,000 feet from
schools, parks, libraries, churches and other so-called "sensitive
uses," and cannot abut or be across the street from any residence,
which excludes almost all commercial areas in the city.
"The dispensary ordinance passed by the Los Angeles City Council might
have been reasonable, if not for some onerous provisions," said ASA
Chief
Counsel Joe Elford, who filed the lawsuit today. "The
requirement to find a new location within 7 days is completely
unreasonable and undermines the due process of otherwise legal medical
marijuana dispensaries." Despite spending more than two years to
develop
regulations, the Los Angeles City Council passed an ordinance without
maps to show where dispensaries could locate in order to comply with
the law.
Among other restrictive provisions, the Los Angeles regulations require
that dispensaries "notify the City Clerk within one week after the
effective date of this ordinance of their intention to register...at an
identified location." The lawsuit's plaintiffs, Venice Beach Care
Center and PureLife Alternative Wellness Center, two dispensaries that
have operated in Los
Angeles since before the city's moratorium, call the 7-day requirement
to find a new site unnecessarily prohibitive. Plaintiffs further argue
that without the
assistance of maps such a requirement is inconceivable.
"We want to work with the city to comply with its regulations, but such
unreasonable requirements make compliance impossible," said plaintiff
Yamileth Bolanos of PureLife Alternative Wellness Center. "We
are more than willing to negotiate a compromise that would cut short
costly litigation." The plaintiffs understand that the City of Los
Angeles is facing a budget shortfall of more than $200 million and want
to
strike a fair balance between the concerns of elected officials and the
needs of thousands of area patients that rely on local dispensaries.
Given the city's economic crisis, many also question the rationale of
expensive enforcement action recently taken by the Los Angeles City
Attorney.
Over the past few years, more than 40 California localities have
adopted ordinances regulating dispensaries. According to advocates, the
Los Angeles regulatory ordinance is one of the most recent and most
restrictive in
the state. Advocates claim that certain provisions in the local
law threaten to shut down all of the city's dispensaries and amount to
a de facto ban. "The
whole point of the moratorium was to study the impact of
restrictions
like these," said ASA spokesperson Kris Hermes. "Unfortunately, a
sufficient assessment never happened." The Planning Department
was unable to provide residential buffer zone maps prior to the passage
of the ordinance and, according to city staff, may never be able to
produce them.
Both plaintiff dispensaries have operated since 2006 without any
negative incidents, criminal or otherwise, and have established good
relations with neighbors. A recent study commissioned by Los Angeles
Police Chief Charlie Beck, comparing the number of crimes in 2009 at
the city's banks and medical marijuana dispensaries, found that 71
robberies had occurred at the more than 350 banks in the city, compared
to 47 robberies at the more than 500 medical marijuana facilities.
Chief Beck observed that, "banks are more likely to get robbed than
medical marijuana dispensaries," and that the claim that dispensaries
attract crime "doesn't really bear out."
Further information:
Lawsuit filed today by Americans for Safe Access:
http://AmericansForSafeAccess.org/downloads/LA_Ordinance_Lawsuit.pdf
City of Los Angeles medical marijuana dispensary ordinance:
http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2008/08-0923_misc_01-19-2010.pdf


Printer Safe Version
Site Map
Link to Us