Media on the Raich Decision

The Compassion Drug
by Steph ShererTom Paine
June 10th, 2005
On June 6, the Supreme Court handed down a split ruling, finding that the federal government has the ability to prosecute medical marijuana patients. While the ruling was disappointing to advocates for medical marijuana, the decision’s effect is to maintain the status quo. The Drug Enforcement Agency can still raid the homes of patients, it can still arrest and confiscate the property of patients, and it can still prosecute and imprison patients. The government’s position on medical marijuana and its ability to act on that position remains the same today as it did before the ruling.
Prosecutions Unlikely of Medical Pot Users
by Mark ShermanAssociated Press
June 7th, 2005
Anyone who lights up a joint for medicinal purposes isn't likely to be pursued by federal authorities, despite a Supreme Court ruling that these marijuana users could face federal charges, people on both sides of the issue say.
Medical Experts Disagree on Marijuana Ruling
by E.J. MundellForbes
June 7th, 2005
Before becoming the medical consultant to the Hospice Foundation of America, Dr. William M. Lamers worked for three decades with terminally ill cancer patients, helping to ease their pain. When asked for his opinion on Monday's 6-3 U.S. Supreme Court decision supporting a nationwide ban on medicinal marijuana, he didn't mince words. "I think it's a tragedy that a drug that's apparently safe and is effective as an analgesic, a real pain reliever, isn't available to patients who need it."
A guide to Gonzales vs. Raich
by Ryan GrimSalon.com
June 7th, 2005
Before Monday's 6-3 Supreme Court ruling in Gonzales vs. Raich, federal agents had the authority to break down the doors of medical marijuana patients and haul them off -- and they still can. But should cancer patients who smoke pot worry about federal agents sending them to the clink? The reality is that more than 99 percent of all marijuana arrests are made at the state or local level. So if you live in California, where marijuana has been legal for medical purposes since the Compassionate Use Act of 1996, your medical marijuana card makes you pretty safe.
Patients who use marijuana fear worst if forced to stop
by Joan Biskupic, Wendy Koch and John RitterUSA Today
June 7th, 2005
Erin Hildebrandt moved her family from Maryland to Oregon last June for one reason: She wanted to live in a state where she could use marijuana legally. But the Supreme Court's ruling Monday that state medical marijuana laws do not protect Hildebrandt and thousands of other medical-marijuana users from federal prosecution has her fearing the worst.
Court: Patients May Not Use Pot Legally
by Mark ShermanGuardian Unlimited
June 7th, 2005
Anyone who lights up a joint for medicinal purposes isn't likely to be pursued by federal authorities, despite a Supreme Court ruling that these marijuana users could face federal charges, people on both sides of the issue say.
Top court rejects marijuana for sick
by Jan Crawford GreenburgChicago Tribune
June 7th, 2005
Terminally ill patients who smoke marijuana to alleviate pain can be prosecuted for violating federal drug laws, even if their own state laws allow them to use marijuana for medical purposes, the Supreme Court ruled Monday.
Calif AG says effect of medical marijuana ruling may be limited
by Kim CurtisAssociated Press
June 6th, 2005
Oregon stopped issuing medical marijuana cards to sick citizens on Monday, but people could still get pot with a doctor's prescription there and in nine other states despite the Supreme Court ruling, and nobody in law enforcement appeared eager to make headlines arresting ailing citizens.
Supreme Court Rules Against Medical Marijuana
by Todd ZwillichWebMD Medical News
June 6th, 2005
The federal government may prosecute patients who use marijuana even in states with laws allowing medicinal use of the drug, the Supreme Court ruled Monday.
Court rules medical marijuana laws don't shield users
by Richard Willing and the Associated PressUSA Today
June 6th, 2005
Federal authorities may prosecute sick people who smoke marijuana for medicinal purposes, even in states that have legalized the practice, the Supreme Court ruled Monday.
Supreme Court allows prosecution of medical marijuana
by Bill MearsCNN
June 6th, 2005
The U.S. Supreme Court Monday ruled doctors can be blocked from prescribing marijuana for patients suffering from pain caused by cancer or other serious illnesses.
Marijuana Plaintiffs to Defy Court Ruling
by David KravetsAssociated Press
June 6th, 2005
The two plaintiffs in the medical marijuana case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday say they will defy the ruling and continue to smoke pot, even at the risk of arrest by federal authorities.
Medical pot user vows to fight on
by Chuck CarrollThe Mercury News
June 6th, 2005
Oakland resident Angel Raich said she will continue to use medical marijuana under her doctor's care, despite today's U.S. Supreme Court ruling that the federal government can continue to enforce the federal ban on put in states and localities that have medical cannabis laws.
Raich Vows to Continue Medical Marijuana Battle
CBS 5: Local Wire
June 6th, 2005
An Oakland patient who says she needs medical marijuana to survive said today she plans to keep on using the drug and to continue her legal battle despite losing her case in U.S. Supreme Court.